The Return of Theseus to Athens: a case study in Layered Tradition and Reception

Zaccarini, Matteo (2015) The Return of Theseus to Athens: a case study in Layered Tradition and Reception. Histos. The Online Journal of Ancient Historiography, 9 . pp. 174-198. ISSN 2046-5955
Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text(pdf) (Historical and historiographical study of the tradition on the return of the bones of Theseus to Athens in the 5th century BC)
License: Creative Commons Attribution

Download (237kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Athenian recovery of Theseus’ bones from Scyros is known through a number of literary accounts spanning several centuries. The tradition dates the recovery to the early fifth century and connects it to the Athenian statesman Cimon. Modern reconstructions tend to rely on the combination of different (and possibly conflicting) sources. An analysis of the evidence, however, shows that the story was built up over several centuries, as the various layers of the tradition date to different historical and cultural contexts: its core probably dates to the fourth century. Evidence for any fifth-century element is so scant that most of the story may be safely detached from its alleged historical context.

Abstract
Document type
Article
Creators
CreatorsAffiliationORCID
Zaccarini, MatteoUniversity of Edinburgh
Keywords
storia greca; storiografia antica; religione greca; democrazia ateniese; storia greca classica; Cimone; Teseo
Subjects
ISSN
2046-5955
DOI
Deposit date
28 Nov 2017 09:29
Last modified
28 Nov 2017 09:29
URI

Other metadata

All users are allowed to access freely to the work, to reproduce, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display it and to produce and distribute derivative works, in any digital format, for a strictly personal private use or for teaching or research purposes, with express prohibition of any direct or indirect commercial use. Users are also authorized by the right holder to reproduce a limited number of printed copies of the work for their own personal use. In any case, moral rights of the author /s should be respected, mainly adequately acknowledging the right of paternity.

Downloads

Downloads

Staff only: View the document

^