Cicognani, Simona ;
Figini, Paolo ;
Magnani, Marco
(2016)
Social Influence Bias in Online Ratings: A Field Experiment.
Bologna:
Dipartimento di Scienze economiche DSE,
p. 35.
DOI
10.6092/unibo/amsacta/4669.
In: Quaderni - Working Paper DSE
(1060).
ISSN 2282-6483.
Full text available as:
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the empirical phenomenon of rating bubbles, i.e. clustering on extremely positive values in e-commerce platforms and rating web sites. By means of a field experiment that exogenously manipulates prior ratings for a hotel in an important Italian tourism destination, we investigate whether consumers are influenced by prior ratings when evaluating their stay (i.e., social influence bias). Results show that positive
social influence exists, and that herd behavior is asymmetric: information on prior positive ratings has a stronger influence on consumers’ rating attitude than information on prior mediocre ratings. Furthermore, we are able to exclude any brag-or-moan effect: the behavior of frequent reviewers, on average, is not statistically different from the behavior of consumers who have never posted ratings online. Yet, non-reviewers exhibit a higher influence
to excellent prior ratings, thus lending support to the social influence bias interpretation. Finally, also repeat customers are affected by prior ratings, although to a lesser extent with respect to new customers.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the empirical phenomenon of rating bubbles, i.e. clustering on extremely positive values in e-commerce platforms and rating web sites. By means of a field experiment that exogenously manipulates prior ratings for a hotel in an important Italian tourism destination, we investigate whether consumers are influenced by prior ratings when evaluating their stay (i.e., social influence bias). Results show that positive
social influence exists, and that herd behavior is asymmetric: information on prior positive ratings has a stronger influence on consumers’ rating attitude than information on prior mediocre ratings. Furthermore, we are able to exclude any brag-or-moan effect: the behavior of frequent reviewers, on average, is not statistically different from the behavior of consumers who have never posted ratings online. Yet, non-reviewers exhibit a higher influence
to excellent prior ratings, thus lending support to the social influence bias interpretation. Finally, also repeat customers are affected by prior ratings, although to a lesser extent with respect to new customers.
Document type
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Creators
Keywords
Online Ratings, User-Generated Contents, Field Experiment, Rating Bubbles, Social Influence Bias,
Herd Behavior
Subjects
ISSN
2282-6483
DOI
Deposit date
26 Feb 2016 08:47
Last modified
08 May 2017 13:10
URI
Other metadata
Document type
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Creators
Keywords
Online Ratings, User-Generated Contents, Field Experiment, Rating Bubbles, Social Influence Bias,
Herd Behavior
Subjects
ISSN
2282-6483
DOI
Deposit date
26 Feb 2016 08:47
Last modified
08 May 2017 13:10
URI
Downloads
Downloads
Staff only: