Bigoni, Maria ;
Bortolotti, Stefania ;
Parisi, Francesco ;
Porat, Ariel
(2016)
Unbundling Efficient Breach: An Experiment.
Bologna:
Dipartimento di Scienze economiche DSE,
p. 40.
DOI
10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5457.
In: Quaderni - Working Paper DSE
(1088).
ISSN 2282-6483.
Full text available as:
Abstract
Current law and economics scholarship analyzes efficient breach cases monolithically. The standard analysis holds that breach is efficient when performance of a contract generates a negative total surplus for the parties. However, by simplistically grouping efficient breach cases as of a single kind, the prior literature overlooks that gainseeking breaches might be different from loss-avoiding breaches. To capture these different motives, we designed a novel game called Contract-Breach Game where we exogenously varied the reasons for the breach — pursuing a gain or avoiding a loss — under a specific performance remedy. Results from an incentivized laboratory experiment indicate that the motives behind the breach induce sizable differences in behavior; subjects are less willing to renegotiate when facing gain-seeking than loss-avoiding breaches,
and the compensation premium obtained by the promisee is higher. Our analysis suggests that inequality aversion is an important driver of our results; indeed, inequality-averse subjects accept low offers more often in cases of loss-avoiding breaches than gain-seeking breaches. These results give us insight into the preferences and expectations of ordinary people in a case of a breach.
Abstract
Current law and economics scholarship analyzes efficient breach cases monolithically. The standard analysis holds that breach is efficient when performance of a contract generates a negative total surplus for the parties. However, by simplistically grouping efficient breach cases as of a single kind, the prior literature overlooks that gainseeking breaches might be different from loss-avoiding breaches. To capture these different motives, we designed a novel game called Contract-Breach Game where we exogenously varied the reasons for the breach — pursuing a gain or avoiding a loss — under a specific performance remedy. Results from an incentivized laboratory experiment indicate that the motives behind the breach induce sizable differences in behavior; subjects are less willing to renegotiate when facing gain-seeking than loss-avoiding breaches,
and the compensation premium obtained by the promisee is higher. Our analysis suggests that inequality aversion is an important driver of our results; indeed, inequality-averse subjects accept low offers more often in cases of loss-avoiding breaches than gain-seeking breaches. These results give us insight into the preferences and expectations of ordinary people in a case of a breach.
Document type
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Creators
Keywords
contract damages, efficient breach, motives for breach, Contract-Breach game
Subjects
ISSN
2282-6483
DOI
Deposit date
07 Dec 2016 09:50
Last modified
08 May 2017 14:32
URI
Other metadata
Document type
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Creators
Keywords
contract damages, efficient breach, motives for breach, Contract-Breach game
Subjects
ISSN
2282-6483
DOI
Deposit date
07 Dec 2016 09:50
Last modified
08 May 2017 14:32
URI
Downloads
Downloads
Staff only: