Abstract

This dataset analyzes thirteen judicial decisions from Brazil, Chile, and Ecuador (2016–2021) concerning the collective expulsion of migrants in contexts of irregular entry. The case law is codified according to twelve variables derived from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' jurisprudence. The data enables an assessment of transjudicial dialogue, measuring how domestic courts engage with Inter-American precedents. By mapping commonalities and discrepancies in the application of regional standards, this dataset supports the findings presented in the article “Vertical Transjudicial Dialogue and Collective Expulsions in South America: The Cases of Brazil, Chile, and Ecuador”.