Philip, Gill
(2007)
Adverb use in EFL student writing.
[Preprint]
Full text available as:
Abstract
Adverbs, especially those occurring in adverb+adjective collocations, play a central role in the language that advanced learners are expected to produce in their argumentative writing. However submodifying adverbs of degree such as ‘closely’, ‘deeply’, ‘strongly’ and ‘widely’ have been identified as being problematic for learners of English: Italian learners over-use very and really to the virtual exclusion of any other adverb (Philip 2007). This situation is due in part to the EFL curriculum, but monolingual and bilingual learner’s dictionaries appear to do little to address the issue. This contribution examines the treatment of lexical adverbs of degree in the five major English dictionaries for advanced learners (CALD, COBUILD, LDOCE, MED and OALD). It also assesses the treatment of the same forms in four bilingual dictionaries specifically aimed at Italian learners of English (Longman, Oxford Study, Rizzoli-Laroussse and Oxford-Paravia). Analysis reveals that these dictionaries do little or nothing to help students expand their workiong knowledge of adverbs of degree. The presentation of lexical adverbs is seen on the whole to be subservient to the adjectives from which they are derived. The information boxes which most modern learner’s dictionaries include seem to focus on elementary matters of grammar and word choice rather than on the collocation of these polysemous, metaphorically-motivated language items. The contribution concludes by suggesting some ways in which monolingual and bilingual learners’ dictionaries might modify their treatment of lexical adverbs in order to enable students to identify and use alternatives to ‘very’, ‘really’ and ‘a lot’.
Abstract
Adverbs, especially those occurring in adverb+adjective collocations, play a central role in the language that advanced learners are expected to produce in their argumentative writing. However submodifying adverbs of degree such as ‘closely’, ‘deeply’, ‘strongly’ and ‘widely’ have been identified as being problematic for learners of English: Italian learners over-use very and really to the virtual exclusion of any other adverb (Philip 2007). This situation is due in part to the EFL curriculum, but monolingual and bilingual learner’s dictionaries appear to do little to address the issue. This contribution examines the treatment of lexical adverbs of degree in the five major English dictionaries for advanced learners (CALD, COBUILD, LDOCE, MED and OALD). It also assesses the treatment of the same forms in four bilingual dictionaries specifically aimed at Italian learners of English (Longman, Oxford Study, Rizzoli-Laroussse and Oxford-Paravia). Analysis reveals that these dictionaries do little or nothing to help students expand their workiong knowledge of adverbs of degree. The presentation of lexical adverbs is seen on the whole to be subservient to the adjectives from which they are derived. The information boxes which most modern learner’s dictionaries include seem to focus on elementary matters of grammar and word choice rather than on the collocation of these polysemous, metaphorically-motivated language items. The contribution concludes by suggesting some ways in which monolingual and bilingual learners’ dictionaries might modify their treatment of lexical adverbs in order to enable students to identify and use alternatives to ‘very’, ‘really’ and ‘a lot’.
Document type
Preprint
Creators
Additional Information
Versione preliminare (extended abstract)
Keywords
adverbs, intensifiers, learner corpora, dictionary
Subjects
DOI
Deposit date
12 Mar 2008
Last modified
16 May 2011 12:07
URI
Other metadata
Document type
Preprint
Creators
Additional Information
Versione preliminare (extended abstract)
Keywords
adverbs, intensifiers, learner corpora, dictionary
Subjects
DOI
Deposit date
12 Mar 2008
Last modified
16 May 2011 12:07
URI
Available versions of this document
-
Adverb use in EFL student writing. (deposited 12 Mar 2008)
[Currently displayed]
This work may be freely consulted and used, may be printed on paper with own personal equipment (without availing of third -parties services), for strictly and exclusively personal, research or teaching purposes, with express exclusion of any direct or indirect commercial use, unless otherwise expressly agreed between the user and the author or the right holder. All other rights are reserved. In particular, it is not allowed to reproduce the work on a permanent basis in a digital format (i.e. saving) and to retransmit it via telecommunication network, to distribute or send it in any form, including the personal redirection (e-mail).
Downloads
Downloads
Staff only: